By Dr Olav Albuquerque
IN Goa, refusing to register FIRs is as common as the rest of India. The police throughout India flout the 2013 Supreme Court ruling in Lalita Kumari versus State of UP that an FIR must be compulsorily registered in cognizable (serious) crimes. This is why it took over 16 hours for the Kolkata police to register the FIR after the corpse of the brutalized doctor was found in the seminar room of the RG Kar Medical College. Her alleged rapist Sanjay Roy may escape the gallows despite the loud baying for his blood.
The superintendent first passed off the rape-cum-murder as a suicide when the brutalized body was found at 7.30am but the FIR was registered only at 11.45pm Such incidents have become passe’ with India having the dubious distinction of rape being the fourth most common crime.
In a separate incident protesters blocked the railway tracks at Badlapur for several hours on Tuesday when a call for a bandh was issued after the janitor of a reputed school raped two minor girls. Rape has become passe’ with India getting a bad name in the West so that some years ago, a travel advisory was issued cautioning white European women not to travel alone in India. On September 14, 2020 a 19-year-old Dalit girl was raped by four men who tied her dupatta around her spinal cord and cut off her tongue.
The UP police cremated her body at 2.30am without the consent of her parents. The point is rape is the most heinous crime which a man can inflict on a woman, forever annihilating her psyche and body. In 2023, India ranked quite low on the Women’s Safety Index. According to the Thomson Reuters Foundation’s 2018 report, India was placed among the most dangerous countries for women, with rampant sexual violence, domestic abuse, and human trafficking.
RAPE GRAPH
AS per the Report of National Crime Report Bureau, the total number of rape cases that were reported were 22,17,24 in 2010, 24,206 in 2011, 24,923 in 2012, 33,707 in 2013, 36,735 in 2014, 34,651 in 2015, 38,947 in 2016. There is no doubt that the rape graph is rapidly rising.
Whether doctor or sweeper, all women enjoy equal rights and the state should ensure those guilty of rape should be punished with a minimum of 20 years in jail. Under the old IPC, a man who raped a woman below 16 years could be jailed for 10 years. If he raped a girl below 12 years, he could be jailed for life. Gang rape can get each rapist a minimum of 20 years in jail. Judge Kshama Joshi of the Goa sessions court acquitted Tarun Tejpal of the charge of rape while the appeal has still not been decided.
In March 2000, the Law Commission submitted its 172nd Report on ‘Review of Rape Laws.’ Some of the recommendations made were that a minor should not be forced to depose about the rape in the presence of her perpetrator. Her testimony should be immediately recorded in the presence of a judge or social worker.
This would include allowing the child to depose via closed-circuit television or from behind a screen to record a full and candid account of the acts complained of. The judge should conduct the cross-examination of the minor based upon the questions submitted by the advocate of the accused.
The old Indian Penal Code referred to “sexual crimes” under sections 375 to 376E. In 1983, sexual offenses by public servants was added as section 114 A of the Indian Evidence Act. The 1983 amendment prohibited humiliating the victim during cross-examination.
Strangely, the LCI took the view that deposing in the presence of the accused should not be totally scrapped but the court should set up a screen so the child would not see her tormentor who could hear the testimony to instruct his advocates for an effective cross-examination.
PATRIARCHAL JUSTICE?
IN the classic 1980s Mathura rape case, the courts took a patriarchal view that this was not a rape but consensual sex as the victim was used to sexual intercourse. The appeal was filed in Bombay high court, which differentiated between “consent” and “passive submission”. The Supreme Court, acquitted the accused of rape because the body of the girl bore no injury marks and she was habituated to sex which led the judges to opine she must have enticed the policemen to ravish her.
The 50th CJI Dhananjaya Chandrachud is arguably the most liberal CJI which this country has ever had. His questions in court asking how the principal of RG Kar Medical College was reinstated hours after resigning from his post, depicts a genuine desire to ensure justice is done. This is why the apex court exercised its suo motu powers which it rarely does. With the three-judge bench directing the CBI to submit its report on Thursday to the court, the judiciary has shown a marked departure from its old patriarchal mindset.
This was on show when the 47th CJI Sharad Bobde asked a government servant who was accused of raping a minor: “Will you marry her? If you are willing to marry her, we will consider this (petition)…or else you will go to jail and lose your job,” added the bench, also comprising justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian. It added that the court was not forcing the accused but was only asking about his willingness.
Such remarks prove the patriarchal attitude of the judges which thankfully is now a thing of the past. Judges’ attitudes are shaped by their environment and experiences.
CJI Bobde who hails from Nagpur and whose father, Arvind Bobde, was the advocate general of Maharashtra under the Congress government, was known to belong to the old school. Soon after demitting office in 2021, the media reported the judge met the RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat in Nagpur. Soon after that momentous meeting with Bhagwat, the former CJI’s mother, Mukta Bobde, passed away. In 2020, a wheeler-dealer cheated her of Rs2.5 crore in a property deal, proving that parents of CJIs are as fallible as anybody else.
